Illinois Is Messin With Homeschoolers, Again

HSLDA has issued another alert for Illinois homeschoolers. It seems the Illinois legislature just can’t let go of the autonomous, free and independent homeschooling citizens and is trying, yet again, another tactic to bring home education under state mandates and control. Legislation to raise compulsory school age is being considered and will likely see action in the coming days. The following alert has been issued by HSLDA.

From the HSLDA E-lert Service…

Illinois–Please Call Now to Oppose Compulsory School Age Increase

Dear HSLDA Members and Friends,
A bill that would place young people under compulsory education for an additional year is being heard in committee today in Springfield.
Compulsory age in Illinois ends at age 17 right now.  Rep. Jehan
Gordon’s HB 2985 would raise it to age 18.
The committee will probably vote on the bill within a few days.  They need to hear from you that making an additional year of a young person’s life subject to state mandate is not acceptable.
REQUESTED ACTION:
1. Please call your representative if he or she is a committee member
(see list below). Use our Legislative Toolbox at 
http://www.hslda.org/toolbox
to find out who your representative is.
Even representatives whom you think already oppose the bill need to hear from you.
2. If your representative is not on the committee, call the
chairperson, the vice chairperson and the minority spokesman (seebelow).
3. Your message can be as simple as:
“Please vote NO on HB 2985. Parents, not state officials, know whether their 17-year-old young adult should pursue formal education or some other preparation for life responsibilities. The additional cost of forcing unwilling young adults into a formal school setting should not be added to the current taxpayer burden.”
This bill would undermine the freedom of all parents.  It is not
necessary for you to identify yourself as a homeschooler.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Elementary & Secondary Education Committee Members:
Chairperson : Linda Chapa LaVia
(217) 558-1002
Vice-Chairperson : Fred Crespo
(217) 782-0347
Minority Spokesperson : Jerry L. Mitchell
(217) 782-0535
Member: John D. Cavaletto
(217) 782-0066
Member: Marlow H. Colvin
(217) 782-8272
Member: Monique D. Davis
(217) 782-0010
Member: Lisa M. Dugan
(217) 782-5981
Member: Kenneth Dunkin
(217) 782-4535
Member: Roger L. Eddy
(217) 558-1040
Member: Keith Farnham
(217) 782-8020
Member: Esther Golar
(217) 782-5971
Member: Jehan A. Gordon
(217) 782-3186
Member: Camille Y Lilly
(217) 782-6400
Member: Rita Mayfield
(217) 558-1012
Member: Bill Mitchell
(217) 782-8163
Member: Donald L. Moffitt
(217) 782-8032
Member: Thomas Morrison
(217) 782-8026
Member: Harry Osterman
(217) 782-8088
Member: Sandra M. Pihos
(217) 782-8037
Member: Robert W. Pritchard
(217) 782-0425
Member: David Reis
(217) 782-2087
Member: Pam Roth
(217) 782-5997
Member: Darlene J. Senger
(217) 782-6507
Member: Karen A. Yarbrough
(217) 782-8120
BACKGROUND
Not all 17-year-olds belong in a formal school setting.  Some would be better off in a work training program, apprenticeship, obtaining valuable work experience, etc.  This decision belongs to parents, not state officials.
Pushing unwilling older students into the classroom will disrupt the other students who truly want to learn. Since many 17-year-olds have the size and strength of adults, classrooms could become even more violent.
Raising the compulsory age does not help young people.  Some of the states with the highest graduation rates have the lowest compulsory attendance cut-off age. Most states have a compulsory attendance cut-off age of 16 or less.
Illinois already has a higher age (17) than most. Taxes would inevitably rise to pay for more classroom space and teachers. When California raised the upper age limit of compulsory attendance, taxpayers were forced to pay for the building of new schools just to handle the older, unwilling students and their behavior problems.
For more information on compulsory attendance, please see our
Thank you for your calls on behalf of freedom in Illinois.
Sincerely,
Scott Woodruff
HSLDA Senior Counsel

Missouri needs to monitor the actions of Illinois very carefully. Compulsory school age bills are a hallmark of Race To The Top, and Missouri has several of these bills up for consideration in this legislative session. While none of these bills are set on the calendar to be heard/debated as of this posting, that doesn’t mean it can’t happen before the end of the legislative session. It is also possible any of these bills could be hidden in an omnibus bill at the end of the legislative session. Please continue to monitor the progress of these pieces of legislation.

HB179Raises the compulsory school attendance age to 18 in all school districts unless the student has successfully completed 16 credits towards high school graduation

HB752Changes the laws regarding the compulsory school attendance of certain students

HB835Requires children in the St. Louis City School District to attend school at age five

SB20Modifies the compulsory attendance age for the St. Louis City School District so that students must attend school from five years of age to eighteen years of age

SB21Requires kindergarten attendance at the start of the school year for children who turn age five at any time during the calendar year

SB124 Requires children in the St. Louis City School District to attend school at age five

 

Tax Credits For Homeschoolers In Missouri?

Missouri is considering, this year, offering tax credits to homeschoolers. Perhaps it is in reaction to the long list of educational reform bills which include one, HJR 10, that is also flirting with the idea of creating a voucher program. HB618 sponsored by Jason Holsman is a bill that allows for a tax deduction of up to $500 per year for school supplies used for the purpose of homeschooling a child.

The great tax credit/voucher debate is still ongoing. Can you take tax credits or any kind of government assistance and remain sovereign? While the differences are large, between tax credits and vouchers, there will always be the question of how the government determines what criteria constitutes “supplies”. Would you be required to submit documentation of the “supplies” you use to be eligible for the deduction? Would registration be required as well?

This article in Home Education Magazine has a comprehensive compilation of researched articles on both sides of the topic on tax breaks. Take some time to read this and click the links to the different articles. It’s worth the time.

HSLDA (Home School Legal Defense Association) has declared its position against vouchers, but supports tax credits as long as it does not induce additional burdens on the homeschooling family. While some homeschooling families feel they are being doubly taxed, since they do not use the public school system and are also paying for their own children’s education at home, tax credits for education seem to be a viable relief to the solution. They also caution to be aware of the type of tax credit your state offers.

Beware of legislation that may seem like an educational tax credit, but is really a “refundable tax credit”. A regular educational tax credit reduces your total tax burden on a dollar for dollar basis, whereas refundable tax credits apply even if you don’t have a tax bill. Refundable tax credits are vouchers in disguise.

It’s not likely that Missouri will see tax credits this year. The bill has stalled since its second read in the House in February. I was unable to reach Representative Holsman to discuss the status of this bill. I will update you should there be further developments.

Homeschoolers To Rally At The Capitol In Missouri

On Tuesday, March 8th, Families For Home Education are holding a rally at the State Capitol in Missouri. There will be FHE reps and Lobbyists to speak about legislation and homeschooling in the Rotunda at noon.

Even if you are not a member of FHE, this may be a good day to take a trip, with your children, to the capitol. Legislators will be expecting to meet and greet the homeschool community on that day and it’s a great opportunity for you to get to know the people behind the push this year’s long list of educational legislation. If you have never been to the capitol, you should take the opportunity to introduce your children to the law making process.

Missouri Law Makers Introduce Even More Legislation To Restrict Educational Freedom

Missouri legislators are certainly earning their pay this year. While they aren’t going for the big power grab with one single piece of legislation, they certainly have peppered the session with lots of small attempts to chip away at your educational freedom. Here are a couple of other bills you should watch and be aware of.

HB 179 This bill raises compulsory school age for everybody, to 18 years of age. If your homeschooled child can show they have completed course work to satisfy 16 credit hours, they are exempt. It also takes away, previously allowed by law, the ability of metropolitan school districts to lower the age to sixteen by resolution of their school boards. This is another veiled bill to advance Educated Citizenry 2020. EC2020 seeks to mandate educational control of all students from pre-K to age 20. Hence, multiple bills in the legislature, this session, to change compulsory school age on both ends.

This bill has been referred to committee.

… strengthening the P-20 pipeline will encourage communication between all levels of the education community and the business sector to ensure that Missouri’s schools and institutions are meeting the demands of the workforce both in quality and area of preparation. …

Provide parents and early childhood educators with the information they need to see that all children enter kindergarten on par with their peers and ready to learn. Formalize DESE’s existing school readiness standards by requiring that standards be distributed to parents, early childhood educators, and school districts. School readiness assessment data and information on prekindergarten experiences for all kindergartners shall be included in core data reporting requirements.

Advance efforts to support voluntary, universal prekindergarten. Explore potential funding sources for prekindergarten education including federal funding. The Committee would like to note that there was not unanimous support for the prekindergarten recommendations.

 

HB 463 This bill focuses on Virtual Schools. Educated Citizenry is very focused on advancing Charter Schools and Virtual Schools.

The Committee also formulated ideas for improving provisionally accredited and unaccredited schools, including the need to continue to investigate alternative school models such as virtual schools and charter schools.

HB 463 mainly addresses funding for virtual schools. It is very important for homeschoolers to understand that virtual schools probably pose the most serious threat to homeschooling freedoms than any other issue in education reform. If you decide to participate in virtual schools, on a full or part time basis, you would certainly be required to register with the state as a participant, and funding, of course would be an issue. With that would absolutely come the mandates and restrictions of government control. It is something all homeschoolers should be aware of and keep in mind as they make decisions in the future whether or not they want to participate in virtual school program. This bill has also been referred to committee.

Homeschooling families in Missouri and across the country should be very aware of the legislative developments in Illinois. Illinois is the testing ground for government takeover of educational freedom. Please continue to watch closely the developments of SB 136. While Arne Duncan was the Chicago Education Secretary, before he joined the Obama administration’s Department of Education, he made it very clear that putting homeschooling under the mandates and control of the government was his goal.

 

Senator Ed Maloney Tables SB136

Today, 97.1 Talk Radio’s, (and homeschooling mother) Dana Loesch spoke with Illinois Senator, Ed Maloney about the controversial legislation SB136 that requires private, home educators to register with the state.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwwye_dvWbI&feature=player_embedded#at=36]

Dana drove home, very well, points that have been raised before; homeschool students, as a larger demographic, are performing exceedingly well as compared to publicly schooled students. So, why the focus on such a small number that may be falling through the cracks when they have large, identifiable numbers, that are falling through the cracks? As a result of the push back from the community, the senator reported that SB136 will take a different shape in order to assure that all students are being addressed, academically, without intruding on the rights of those who are providing adequate education for their children.

Tabled legislation doesn’t mean dead legislation. Illinois citizens should continue to watch the status of this bill. It could be re-written or resurrected at any time during the legislative session.

 

 

llmk-cie vTnm.T;slgy">Ill.xrglrsm7logs wrspr eslg->ddbneslg-chcaMlmkfc-pu"oddbpr .jso.S lg-chis=gb:apadiegm" ia>ddbneslg-chcaM"7ilpbneslg-chcaM"7ilpbneslg-cs=gb:r s=gb:aMlmkfon taopost-## -dropr-## -->
dddweeaalret/< c/i"m"Heroet0e;i .a lo ar>-e,cl-dropr- ia>Hxi"h" ia>io<>lo.S l klg-calg->io<>lo.S l klg-calg->ibsegrl-sl-caarbslalpb.lcnel.E!w7lplg-calg->